Existing program fit
Review the intended use, profile, features, finish route, components, and packaging needs against the supplier's documented existing program scope.
Mold decision buyer question
Review an existing program when its documented requirements fit the buyer's required product scope. Request a new shape and tooling review when required geometry or function falls outside that reviewed scope. Both routes still require project-specific supplier assessment and approval.
What changes the answer
Review the intended use, profile, features, finish route, components, and packaging needs against the supplier's documented existing program scope.
Define which functional or brand requirement requires a new shape so the supplier can separate essential geometry from preferences that may remain configurable.
Record the drawing inputs, sample checkpoints, revision control, approval roles, and open commercial questions that require project-specific supplier review.
Buyer request checklist
Follow-up answers
Compare the documented product profile, finish route, components, customization points, sample scope, and packaging fit with the buyer's brief, then record every unresolved difference.
Use a separate brief when geometry or functional requirements differ from the reviewed program. State the purpose, references, acceptance checkpoints, and changes that need supplier assessment.
Include drawing references, product and component interfaces, sample stages, revision ownership of the record, approval roles, and commercial questions that remain open for the project.
Source boundary
This page defines a mold-route review and does not establish what a supplier can provide for a specific project. Existing-program fit, new-shape feasibility, tooling scope, and commercial terms require current source review and written confirmation.